Posts Tagged Content

Let’s take a look at the Fast Flip side

Sometimes the road to new habits and new technology is littered with temporary bridges and make-do paths, products with a very important but very short shelf-life, and products that fill a gap until a better idea comes along.

Is Google Fast Flip one of these, or is it the start of something much bigger?

In a media industry that focuses on every piece of info, trivial or not, press  coverage of Fast Flip the last few days has been middle of the road, respectable but not overwhelming.

The New York Times wrapped up Fast Flip nicely in its article.  PC World and Mashable provided similar coverage.

Google’s Fast Flip is basically just a new way to view the news. Google has 39 partners, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, BBC, Cosmopolitan and Harper’s Bazaar.

Give it a try. Click on an article and flip through the article, a la traditional media. There are ads on the pages, and it’s a revenue share with the partners.

Maybe it’s a short-term play, has a comfort level for some and bridges the gap for others. Maybe it’s a keeper.

And maybe - just maybe - it doesn’t need a lot of analyzing. It’s just another way to read, and whenever that happens, it’s good.

Also, not a bad thing that Google and traditional media found a way to work together.

, ,

No Comments

The cost of staying in business

henry-grady1

Henry Grady statue in downtown Atlanta

Because big city newspapers have history behind them, they also generally have real estate of high value. That’s particularly true for the papers that have been around a while.

Many sit on valuable downtown property. Some have classic historic buildings. Some have modern-era concrete and glass boxes, many looking dingy because the pressure washer budget item was the first and easiest thing to cut.

Over the past year many newspaper buildings have gone on the market. Most notable is the architectural gem that serves as The New York Times building. It’s spectacular inside and out, though a bit unnerving when you’re walking through the interior, and the energy-efficient blinds open and close on their own, reacting to heat or sunlight or a small man behind the curtain pulling the strings.

Last time I was there, when that happened in a stairwell with no one else around, I felt a bit like Dave in the movie 2001, and expected to hear HAL ask of me: “Just what do you think you’re doing, Dave?”

In the street level glass-enclosed atrium, the silvery birch trees, surrounded by moss, are relaxing and stunning. But you just have to wonder, like we wonder about the newspaper industry every day, can they survive, and what will they look like five years from now if they do?

The Times sold a portion of its building earlier this year, and leased it back, trying to help cover loss of ad revenue.

So it came as no surprise last week when another big city newspaper, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, announced (after the Atlanta Business Chronicle first reported it) that it is considering moving out of its downtown location, and out of the city limits. A decision will be announced  in a  few weeks.

The move makes sense. It’s a superb location, and when the real estate market rebounds, could bring a nice price and be a prime location for a hotel or other large facility, close to Centennial Park, Phillips Arena, CNN and Five Points.

And while the move makes sense, you just have to hate it, because it’s one more signal of the changing landscape.

The building itself, an early 70s creation, is no historic treasure. But The Atlanta Journal (founded 1883) and The Atlanta Constitution (founded 1868), once separate newspapers, once under separate ownership, do have a long history in downtown Atlanta.

I spent 22 years in that building. The first six at The Atlanta Journal, located then on the sixth floor of the 72 Marietta St. building. The Atlanta Constitution was on the 8th floor. In six years there (first time around before I left to buy and run my own small weekly), I never sat foot on the Con’s 8th floor, though I did sneak into their computer system (allegedly a firing offense) a few times. Competition was  fierce, and you didn’t dare step onto the competitor’s floor.

Journal folks always took pride in knowing that as afternoon papers elsewhere died in the 70s and 80s, The Journal lived on. In fact, it took Elvis ’s death on the Con cycle to finally let the morning paper ease ahead of the afternoon paper in circulation.

The Journal owned the classic slogan: Covers Dixie Like the Dew, and those of us working there were fiercely proud and lived to cover Dixie like the dew. The reporters and editors on the Constitution, I am sure, felt they were the best, but they were saddled with not only a fanatical crew at The Journal but a weak masthead slogan (”The South’s Standard Newspaper,” if I recall correctly. Can’t find it on the Web because likely no one wants  to remember it.)

There were many fond memories. Herb, my boss, legal pad in hand, walking over at 6:55 a.m., 35 minutes before deadline for the second edition of the day. We had six editions daily, truly amazing. Herb’s greeting: “Bud, we got three dead in Telfair County. Need 6 graphs for the Early. That’s all I know. Get on it, Bud.”  ”Bud” wasn’t my name then; that’s what Herb called all the guys. All the young ladies were “Gal,” until one day one young lady told him differently. Thirty-five minutes to find the sheriff,  get him to talk to you, or find a deputy if he’s not around, hoping somebody would answer the radio call (remember, no cell phones then). Write it, get it edited, and sent off to the copy desk. We always did it, for the readers, and for The Journal.

Other times you could feel the power of a newspaper, like on Thanksgving Eve, when the paper was bursting at the seams with ads and editorial. On my second stint there, in the 90s, when I was in newsroom management, I’d go to the pressroom to wait for the all-critical press start of the biggest paper of the year. We felt like every second counted, though in reality it was “only” every minute that counted. If it didn’t start on time, and if it was editorial’s fault, I’d answer why. So I liked to be present. I’d stand squarely in a spot I determined was exactly in the middle between those four massive TKS presses. I planted my feet on the steel planking (second floor level, presses still rising several floors to the high roof), waiting for all four presses to crank up and be in sync. Every press unit was in use, the only day of the year that happened.   There was a steady thrumming, a building of both pressure and sound, the steel planking trembling under my feet, then the papers rushing out through the folders, hooking up to the Ferag system, circling around the roof, headed to the mailroom upstairs. That’s one meaning of power of the press.

Then there was the Olympics. Am amazing period of collaboration and teamwork. I wonder sometimes how today’s paper would pull off covering an in-town Olympics, probably the same way people wonder if we’ll be able to fly to the moon again as easily as we seemed to do forty years ago.

It was one end, and beginning of another march to another ending, in November 2001 when The Journal was closed. The slogan on the last day: “Covered Dixie Like The Dew.”

Fond memories, but that was then, and now is now.

So I will respectfully disagree with my  AJC friends (some current employees, some former employees) on Facebook mourning the likely move. (Feelings are mixed, it seems.)

Though I hate it, a move is so economically logical, it’s a must-do.

And anywhere a paper can apply economic logic, a commodity seemingly in short supply in recent years, do so.

It’s a shame it came to this.

But remember,  the soul of a paper is not built around brick and mortar, presses or digital, whether the building is downtown or located in Jasper, Georgia.

The soul comes from its people, its writers, its heritage, what the paper stands for, how it includes the community. It doesn’t come from jingles or marketing slogans.  If readers don’t like the paper and truly connect with those who run it, it will become very easy to find a nice cozy location elsewhere.

Those who helped make The Journal and The Constitution what they were a few years back would likely be aghast. I can visualize Celestine Sibley’s response to a move, and can hear Lewis Grizzard grousing over it.

And Margaret Mitchell and Ralph McGill likely wouldn’t be pleased.

And of course, Henry Grady, the editor of The Constitution and spokesman for the New South in the years after the Civil War, would have hated to depart the heart of the city.

But they all would likely say, do it. Save some money. Save the paper. But first, make sure you save your readers, make them want  to read you. Don’t talk down to them. Respect them, and give them a  good paper.

If the paper does move out of downtown, that means that Henry Grady’s statue, a few paces from the newspaper, will be all alone.

And what of the little-known tradition of the Constitution editor firing the paper’s little black cannon at the base of Grady’s statue, on election night whenever a Democrat is elected President?

That, too, gone with the wind.

,

1 Comment

A light at the end of the tunnel?

ideas43_r1268_s18_rOr is that a train loaded with unused newsprint rushing full speed ahead at us?

Three promising signs indicate that possibly, maybe, perhaps the newspaper industry is finally starting to break free from the bottom, where it has been mired for many, many months.

Those signs:

1. The New York Times reports that The Seattle Times, the city’s surviving newspaper after the rival Post-Intelligencer closed its print operation several months ago, is in black ink. With the P-I’s closing, The Times circulation jumped 30 percent, from 200,000 to 260,000, in June.  And at the P-I, a Web-only operation now, owner Hearst says things are going better than expected, with audience and revenue better than forecast.

2. Gordon Borrell, a long-time observer of the newspaper industry and head of Borrell Associates, is forecasting a “mild rebound”  for local newspapers in 2010, perhaps a 2.4 percent increase in advertising. Borrell reports that smaller newspapers “are firmly entrenched in their niche of providing rich local content that people seem to prefer in print – rather than screen – format.” That matches the thinking in corporate conference rooms three years ago when the bottom started to fall out. Then the only solace was a belief that at least the small to medium size newspapers would weather the building storm. Borrell suggested we all might want to remember his forecast and take a look one year from today.

3. And last, early data from MORI Research, announced by the Newspaper Association of America, reports that 59 percent of adults identify newspapers as the medium they use for planning, shopping and purchase decisions. This means, the report says, that newspapers are still the leading advertising medium cited by consumers for these activities. NAA President and CEO, John Sturm, says “… while new technologies have their place in any total marketing program… newspaper advertising remains the most powerful tool for advertisers who want to motivate consumers to take action… “

Good stuff, but not yet time to uncork the champagne bottle.

Newspapers face a very tough road, and so far the attempts at righting the ship have come mostly from slash and burn cost-cutting over the last 12 months. Not much room or time to innovate or invent “the new model.”

But now newspapers are in Phase 2: trying to publish a quality print product, while moving forward on the digital front and trying to woo advertisers back.

Any one of those alone is a tall order in good times; an amazing challenge when staff ranks are depleted and morale is down.

But as Yogi Berra and Lenny Kravitz agree, “It ain’t over till it’s over.”

And these three reports seem to indicate it ain’t over.

As a pal/editor at the Palm Beach Post says: Onward.

, ,

No Comments

It’s the content, mister

Bill Robinson - writer extraordinaire, the man who dubbed Richard Petty “The King,” the man who once rolled a flat tire into the office to save his job - died last month in Alabama.

What does that have to do with this blog’s normal topic,  digital news and trends? Nothing and everything. More on that later.

I, and a bunch of other now-gfxphp3departed  reporters and editors, spent some time with Bill (I called him Robbie then, but he also went by Billy Bob or Bill) at The Atlanta Journal (it really did “Cover Dixie Like the Dew,” like it said on the masthead) a good many years ago.

Robbie was a true gentleman, but also a true character in an era when there was no shortage of characters in newsrooms. This was a time when it was normal for your city editor to scream across the room, “John, come up here and tell me why we ought to run this piece of xxxx.” It was rough and tumble, take a lickin’ and keep on tickin’. Robbie, and the rest of us, kept on tickin’.

Sometimes he was late for work. One day his boss laid down the law: next time you’re late you’re fired. No doubt it’d be a quick and merciless firing; the HR folks back then didn’t even know where the newsroom was, much less get involved in its inner workings. One day soon, Bill doesn’t show up at his start time; the clock ticks on. The elevator door opens and Robbie comes out, rolling a flat tire: “I swear guys I had a flat tire. Here it is.” He made it for another day.

So back to the question: what does the death of a true wordsmith have to do with the industry today, the digital environment we’re in?

Robbie probably never heard of audience bifurcation, and he would have thought a “personal brand” was something only Texans had.

I doubt he ever gave a PowerPoint presentation about what he was going to do; he just did it. I doubt he ever worked a room in the insincere way of so many digi-jorno wanna-bes, halfway talking while glancing around for someone more important to latch onto. He was as sincere as they come.

What Robbie brought to the table was a reminder that content is still what it’s all about, that words can make a difference, that they can paint a picture, they can make you cry, or rejoice.

In a nice obit in the last newspaper where he worked, the Opelika-Auburn News, colleagues from years past talked about his sincerity, his genuineness, his appreciation for good reporting.

One of the writers recalled one of Robbie’s famous leads from his NASCAR reporting days, when he wrote that a car won by “running flat out, belly to the ground, chasing a hurrying sundown.”

Read that lead and tell me words don’t matter. Read that lead and tell me content isn’t important.

Thanks, Robbie, for reminding us.

,

No Comments

Newspapers: Time to act

I’ve never been in a boat with a cracked hull, watching it fill with water, bailing with an old milk jug. And planning my next ’round the world cruise.

But that’s what it feels like today in the world of newspapers.

There’s a leak in the boat, the water line inside rises as the hull dips to meet the water level outside. But it’s time to think, well, what do we do next year.

Hit by the double whammy of a sinking national economy and changing readership habits, newspapers - the institution - are in a sink or swim situation.

But the dilemma is you can’t just work to survive today’s disaster. If that’s your goal, you won’t. Competition is too tough, technology and product move too quickly. If you take a deep breath, you’ve lost the moment.

But with water rushing in, it’s pretty logical to take that deep breath before figuring out the rescue scenario.

A paralysis can set in and that water quickly and quietly filling the boat looks so serene and peaceful as it gurgles your way.

But ultimately it pulls you down.

Newspapers have to shake the paralysis and do “something” - anything - different online.

For all the talk about speed and flexibility, some newspapers still move at the old pace. Lots of meetings, over-planning, slow decision-making. That’s not so much a criticism as a reflection on a long history of careful thought and process, when the balance sheet was different.

Now it’s time to move; the world has changed.

So, in that sense, it was good to see that The New York Times is in the midst of a survey with their valuable print readers, trying to figure out if there is any type of pay online model that could work.

One scenario is $5 a month, half that for print subscribers. Looks like one option is to put some areas behind a paid wall. No scenario calls for blocking off all content.

The idea of paid content online is odious. But perhaps there’s a way that allows portions to go paid, other portions to remain free.

The New York Times has current history on paid content issues. A couple years ago they walled off some columnists, charged a fee through a program called TimesSelect and generated about $10 million. Yet they still dropped it because they felt they could monetize the site better by keeping it fully open and building audience.
Who knows the ultimate resolution of the paid vs. free answer for newspapers, but it’s good to see the NYT seriously looking at scenarios.
They’re bailing out the boat, but looking to the next voyage, too.

, ,

No Comments

“And that’s the way it is, Mr. Cronkite.”

Walter Cronkite, 1974

Cronkite, at a student journalist party at the University of Texas-Austin, 1974.

For 19 years, he anchored the CBS Evening News, giving us the daily signature: “And that’s the way it is…”

But he gave us so much more.

Certainly the premier journalist of his time, he not only recorded and reported the world-changing news of the day - the Kennedy assassination, the moon landing - but he helped change history. His thoughts on Vietnam reportedly helped sway Lyndon Johnson against running for reelection, and his interview with Egyptian President Anwar Sadat nudged him to make his historic visit to Israel.

But, again, he gave us so much more.

Integrity. Compassion. Sincerity.

Not the fake compassion on today’s newscasts. Not the loud braying that accompanies so much of today’s tv reporting.

When he stopped reading the script, took off  his thick dark-rimmed glasses and looked into the camera to talk with you, he spoke so much louder than those today who yell, but their words carry the weight of a whisper.

And let’s not forget that he was a genuine kind of guy.

Cronkite went to the University of Texas, and when he was CBS anchor, he was frequently on campus and recognized for his journalistic successes. There, he was one of the guys. In the 70s, when those of us managing the student paper, The Daily Texan, were in a legal battle with the Board of Regents over free press issues, he signed our petition, wrote the Regents and showed up one day to support us. We lost, but at least he was on our side.

Mark Sims, a friend and now at the Los Angeles Times, saw Cronkite at the j-school in 1974 and invited him to a party at his apartment.

To everyone’s surprise, Cronkite showed up, hung around several hours, talking, visiting and drinking with the students.

Mark told The Daily Texan after Cronkite’s death:

“He represented good values and perhaps morals,” Sims said. “Perhaps it’s generational, but sadly much of that is missing today.”

Mark kept Cronkite’s whiskey glass for many years.

“I no longer have the glass that Walter drank from,” he said. “However, even better, I have memories of a caring gentleman.”

, , ,

No Comments

The need for speed

What’s your school of thought when it comes to publishing systems - newspapers, radio, TV, whatever - and speed to market?  Make it perfect, dot every i, cross every t…spend a couple years. Or get a good one in quickly and grow it, as needs grow?

Okay, you’re thinking this is not exciting, and why do I care? But you’re wrong. Almost everything digital revolves around a “publishing system” of sorts. You’ve got a thought for your Facebook page, but you have to publish it, so how it functions, the interface, the speed, the ease of use make all the difference. Same for this blog. Same for Twitter. Slow and cumbersome, you waste time, and perhaps don’t use as often as you would otherwise.

Same stands for the media and publishing system decisions. Only it’s almost a life or death call now, since so many companies teeter on the edge financially, and finding cash to buy systems, and reinvent their operations, and pay the bills, too,  is a challenge these days.

It also has everything to do with how a media company organizes itself for this century, not the last. Is the staff  (now, much smaller than two years ago) integrated into publishing to all devices, all output methods, or it it split apart, one little group doing this, another doing that? A bunch of separate fiefdoms. Is everyone focused on the content, or the publishing system?

There are already almost too many minefields to navigate. Doesn’t it seem logical - regardless of the name brand - to work to integrate widely across the editorial team, do it right, but know that you keep building it and growing the system as needs change.

But whatever happens, do it quickly. As the industry reinvents, there’s a true need for speed, flexibility and ease of use. It’s simple.

, , , , ,

No Comments

A year from now …

…. will today’s dirge on “the death of newspapers as we know them” be replaced by “the death of radio as we know it,” and “the death of TV as we know it”?

Probably not so directly said - because TV and radio won’t provide as much “ink” to their financial woes as newspapers have in the last 24 months. But it is clearly reinvention time - not to mention redefinition time - for all mass media, not just newspapers.

There’s a decent case to make that TV and radio today are where newspapers were just a few years ago: fretting about the future, but believing and hoping the bottom wouldn’t drop out.

Newspapers had an extra hit to push them along: an over-the-cliff national economy, plus some investments that turned sour.

But all three - newspapers, radio and TV - face the same reality of dramatically changing reader/viewer habits. Newspapers just got a head start, but it’s a good bet many TV and radio companies will follow the same path.

Consider:

1. In smaller radio markets - below the top 50 -ad revenue fell 6.6 percent last year, but around 9 percent in larger markets. Sounds like a repeat of the minimally consoling conversations in newspaper board rooms two years ago that at least the smaller papers are doing okay.

2. With hundreds of channels in place today, and Internet distribution of content just starting to take hold in a big way, what does the future hold for local television stations? Pretty good bet that sorting this out will be as complicating, or moreso, than sorting out today’s newspaper issues.

The good news is TV and radio execs can study newspapers’ attempts to dig out, and reinvent.

But reinvention needs to get started, or it will be a very large hole - as newspaper companies can attest.

First step: think of each TV, radio and newspaper as an information and content business. Not a print or broadcast business.

And those remaining companies that view digital as a nice marketing tool or side business best review the focus, and seize the opportunity. Before others in their market do.

More later.

, , , ,

No Comments

Welcome…

Consider this an intro to a new media blog, one that will hopefully go a bit behind the daily headlines, provide some perspective on the issues roiling around today, and perhaps a bit of outlook for the future. Plus a look at what is and what is not working as everyone tries a hand at experimentation and innovation, seeking answers to the issues confronting the industry. 

The author is John Reetz, a former editor and reporter, who has spent the last decade on the digital side of the business.

Stay tuned for more to come.

, ,

No Comments